The Hill News

What do American political and policy types do with sources of information that repeatedly have proved completely unreliable? Sometimes, it seems, they fetishize them. At least that’s what I saw last week at a House Auto Caucus briefing on the proposed Korea free trade agreement in which I was privileged to participate. 

More broadly, the session unexpectedly spotlighted the need for trade policy critics to stir up a much broader, more fundamental debate on trade policy than Congress and the nation at large have conducted so far.

Read more...