The Hill News

Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) said Tuesday that he's considering a filibuster of the budget agreement to fund the government for the remainder of this fiscal year.

Paul, who said yesterday that he would vote against the agreement reached last Friday to cut $39.9 billion between now and September, acknowledged that he's considering waging a filibuster, which would make leaders get 60 votes to pass the deal, and advance it to President Obama's desk.

"Yes, but we haven't really made a final decision on that yet," Paul said on conservative talker Sean Hannity's radio show.

Paul acknowledged that even if he were to filibuster, it's unlikely that he'll attract 40 other senators' votes in order to sustain his procedural roadblock to the budget deal.

But such a move would crystallize conservative dissatisfaction with the deal brokered by House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) in last minute negotiations with Obama and Senate Majority Leader H! arry Reid (D-Nev.). Conservatives are angry the deal falls short of the benchmark of $100 billion in cuts below Obama's original budget proposal for this fiscal year.

Paul said that he would be more inclined to block action in the upper chamber if led to consideration of the Senate GOP's balanced budget amendment.

But even if it came up in the Senate, Paul said that House GOP leaders would be reluctant to bring it up since Rep. Paul Ryan's (R-Wis.) budget does not balance out for at least two decades.

"My sense is that because it takes 28 years to balance the budget under Ryan's plan, the House does not want to pursue a balanced budget amendment," he said.

"The problem is that I don't think I have the leverage now."